Skip to content
RaiseKit
VCsFundsInvestmentsStart freePricing
RaiseKit

The most comprehensive database of web3 VCs. Built and maintained by AI agents.

Directory

  • VCs
  • Funds
  • Investments
  • Writing
  • Funding
  • Sectors
  • Geography

Resources

  • RSS Feed
  • Changelog
  • Search
  • Compare VCs
  • Reports
  • Activity
  • Deploying

Subscribe

Weekly digest of VC insights and funding rounds.

Subscribe to digest →

© 2026 RaiseKit. Data updated nightly by AI agents.

PrivacyTermsSupportDelete accountRSS
  1. Home
  2. /VCs
  3. /Richard Chen
  4. /Briefing
Pre-Pitch Briefing

Richard Chen

Founder & Solo GP at Varrock VC

Check size: $600K–$900K at pre-seed and seed, published on Varrock's live website. The fund targets a small, concentrated portfolio, commonly 0–1 new investment per quarter, to maintain ownership and hands-on capacity rather than spray and pray.

Pre-SeedSeedStablecoinsPaymentsCrypto-Adjacent FintechCrypto-Native ApplicationsPrediction MarketsOnchain DataAccount AbstractionDeFiFinancial InfrastructureAgentic Payments

Their Thesis

Richard backs concentrated, contrarian pre-seed and seed bets in the future of finance. For crypto-native products, he looks for category creation, missionary founders, power-user retention and continuous zero-to-one product innovation. For crypto-adjacent companies, crypto should be an enabling feature inside a much larger industry, led by commercially strong domain experts with superior distribution and unit economics rather than recent crypto pivots.

How to Pitch Them

Email richard@varrock.vc or use the exact @richardchen39 account; his public bio says DMs are open. State pre-seed/seed round size, why $600K–$900K is the right first commitment, the non-consensus insight and what you learned by doing the work yourself. For crypto-native products, quantify top-user concentration, cohort retention and innovation cadence. For crypto-adjacent companies, show domain expertise, distribution, CAC/LTV, revenue quality and why incumbents cannot add the crypto feature and crush you. Keep valuation compatible with future 2–3x round markups.

What Excites Them

Missionary founders who persist when narratives rotate; founders with an earned, non-consensus view of a category; fast iteration and multiple shots on goal; direct use of onchain data to find emerging behavior; unusually high retention among valuable power users; crypto-adjacent operators with deep industry expertise and a unique go-to-market; fundamentally good businesses ignored because they are not fashionable; and teams capable of selling to institutions.

What They Pass On

Consensus copies built for accelerator legibility; mercenary founders chasing the latest category or retiring after a token launch; pre-PMF companies raising huge rounds at inflated valuations; growth purchased by incentives with poor retention; crypto-native consumer products without sticky revenue; stablecoin neobanks run remotely by founders who do not understand their local users; crypto-adjacent pivots by teams lacking domain expertise; and yield-bearing credit products marketed deceptively as stablecoins.

Key Frameworks

Missionary-versus-mercenary maze

Walk backward and forward through the founder's idea maze to see whether conviction and accumulated insight survive a narrative rotation.

Power-user retention model

For crypto-native products, measure the concentration, activity and retention of the highest-value users; prioritize keeping them over vanity top-line accounts.

Crypto-adjacent domain test

When crypto is a feature, require deep expertise in the larger industry, local user understanding, distribution and defensible unit economics.

Concentration-and-ownership math

Size each investment so a rare outlier can materially return the fund, while limiting portfolio count enough to support founders through difficult periods.

Narrative-independent business

Underwrite revenue quality, customer value and defensibility at normalized multiples instead of assuming the current hot narrative will persist.

Valuation-overhang test

Before PMF, model the traction required for a 2–3x markup at the next round and avoid a headline valuation that eliminates feasible downstream capital.

Recent Writing

What you can't say in Silicon ValleyVenture Thesis

Credential and network-based kingmaking steers founders toward crowded, legible ideas, while the best companies often define categories years before consensus has a name for them.

Building for crypto-native vs. building for crypto-adjacentInvestment Framework

Crypto-native products win by retaining a small power-user base through continual innovation; crypto-adjacent businesses win through industry expertise, distribution and unit economics while crypto stays an enabling feature.

ETH needs a new narrativeMarket Thesis

Network progress does not guarantee asset appreciation when institutional inflows, supply dynamics and valuation multiples change, so investors must distinguish ecosystem usage from token demand.

Raising a VC fund in a bear marketFund Strategy

In power-law venture, LPs care about concentration and ownership because an outlier must be large enough to return the fund; a long-lived VC also has to keep reinventing its edge.

Computer vs. Casino: Crypto's culture warIndustry Thesis

Speculative power users can bootstrap new products, but crypto must grow beyond zero-sum casino mechanics into applications that expand the user base and realize decentralized computing's broader promise.

Podcast Appearances

Why There Is Too Much Money and Not Enough Good Projects in Crypto — Dealflow
Varrockfounder selectionstablecoinsagentic paymentsvaluation disciplineinstitutional distributionintroductions
Richard Chen — 1confirmation — The Inquisitive VC
prediction marketsaccount abstractionpoints and airdropscontrarian fundsLP questionsonchain messaging
Being Early & Data Driven — Frictionless with Logan Jastremski
onchain dataearly-stage investing1confirmationcrypto product trendsDune Analytics
← Full profile