Partner at Maven 11 Capital
Check size: Maven 11 does not publish Darius's personal check range or decision authority. Third-party investor databases estimate ranges, but those figures are not treated as verified evidence. The current firm describes an early-stage venture strategy without attaching a check range to him.
Darius works within Maven 11's crypto-native, early-stage strategy. The firm backs technically fluent founders who challenge the status quo by redefining ownership through open, inclusive, permissionless networks. Its current third-fund focus has shifted from foundational rails toward founders using those rails to reinvent credit, payments, stablecoins, and trading. Darius's own public comments emphasize extensive research into the actual product and business case rather than following a crowded token market.
Lead with the user or market failure and explain why crypto changes ownership, settlement, access, or transparency in a way a conventional system cannot. Demonstrate the actual product and business case, technical architecture, security and trust assumptions, token necessity, early adoption, and a path to durable economics. For current Fund III fit, be concrete about credit, payments, stablecoins, trading, or the infrastructure those applications require.
Brave outliers, founders who act on non-consensus insights, strong technical fluency, open and permissionless ownership models, an understandable product and business case, infrastructure or applications that improve financial transparency and efficiency, and teams willing to work closely with an active investor.
No personal pass list is published. Maven's stated principles and Darius's public comments imply weaker fit for projects whose token obscures the product, teams that have not researched the actual business case, shallow technical architecture, closed ownership without a reason, follower projects with no contrarian insight, and products disconnected from the firm's credit, payments, stablecoin, trading, or enabling-infrastructure focus. These are inferred filters.
Research the actual product, target user, business case, and technical need first; treat token design as an enabling mechanism only after those fundamentals are clear.
Specify who owns what today, how an open network changes access or control, and why the new ownership structure produces a more useful, inclusive, or efficient system.
Require founders to explain system design, trust assumptions, security, settlement, incentives, and failure modes deeply enough to show the technical advantage is real.
Show how mature blockchain rails enable a specific improvement in credit, payments, stablecoins, or trading, then connect that wedge to adoption, liquidity, and sustainable economics.
+ 101 more investments. View fund →