Deal Partner at Lightspeed Faction
Check size: Faction does not publish a standard check range or Clara's personal allocation authority. Its official mandate is Seed and Series A investments across equity and tokens; public round sizes must not be mistaken for Faction's check size.
Clara invests within Faction's early-stage, crypto-native mandate: Seed and Series A projects across the stack, in equity or tokens, that create fundamental utility and push the industry forward. Public portfolio tracking associates her with Fiamma, Pharos, and FLock.io, signaling interest in Bitcoin cryptography, high-performance blockchain infrastructure, and decentralized AI; those associations are treated as portfolio signals rather than a complete personal mandate.
Lead with the useful system outcome and explain why blockchain or a token is essential. Show architecture, security assumptions, developer traction, user demand, token utility and value flow, governance, regulatory constraints, and the milestone this round funds. For infrastructure, quantify performance and adoption; for decentralized AI, explain compute/data incentives and verification; for consumer or payments, show retention, distribution, and compliance.
Crypto-native founders with bold vision and precise execution, a genuinely useful product, technically credible infrastructure, and an incentive system that improves coordination rather than merely adding a token. Faction's published north star is real utility across the stack and entrepreneurs committed to advancing the industry over a long horizon.
No personal pass list is public. Faction's published positioning implies caution toward tokens without utility, undifferentiated infrastructure, projects built primarily for short-term speculation, products whose decentralization does not improve the user or system outcome, and founders without the execution precision to match a large vision.
Ask which trust, ownership, coordination, settlement, or composability property fails without a blockchain; reject designs where decentralization adds cost without changing the outcome.
Underwrite the product's useful demand first, then test whether token ownership, fees, staking, or governance strengthens that demand instead of substituting incentives for retention.
Evaluate compute and data supply, contribution verification, model quality, privacy, incentive resistance, coordination cost, and whether decentralization produces a measurable capability or cost advantage.
+ 49 more investments. View fund →