Partner at Haun Ventures
Check size: No reliable Chris-specific ticket range is public. Haun invests from seed through scale and announced $1 billion of new early- and later-stage capital in May 2026; round evidence includes leading or co-leading seed, Series A and an $82M growth financing, but round size is not the same as Haun's check.
Chris backs community-led and crypto-enabled businesses where open technology creates a durable advantage and a credible business model. His work focuses on the infrastructure of globally programmable finance—stablecoin payments and FX, secure blockspace, onchain real-world assets, business accounts, custody and long-duration Bitcoin products—while testing whether governance, monetization and scale mechanics actually fit the product.
Use Haun's public founder contact route and lead with the customer problem, why crypto materially improves it, stage, traction, business model and security posture. Quantify payment cost/time improvements, transaction volume, retained users, revenue or assets secured. Explain the governance choice, sources of defensibility and how unit economics improve with scale. For regulated financial products, map licensing, counterparties, liquidity and compliance rather than treating regulation as an afterthought.
Founders with a shared long-term vision, technical credibility and commercial fluency; products that deliver order-of-magnitude improvements in global cost or speed; security treated as a product requirement; must-have customer behavior; category-specific networks with high-intent participants; and open infrastructure with an explicit path to defensibility, revenue and scale.
Inferred from his essays: decentralization where it adds governance burden but no strategic advantage, protocols that become more expensive as usage grows without an answer to scaling, alleged network effects with no liquidity or retention loop, open-source projects without a credible hosted or service business, RWA products that lack credible issuers or users, and teams whose investors do not share their vision on unresolved risks.
Choose decentralization only where credible neutrality, broad representation and protocol standardization outweigh the execution cost of distributed decision-making.
Identify whether growth creates a true network effect, falling unit costs, or a diseconomy; require an architectural and economic answer when blockspace gets more expensive with demand.
For community-led software, show what remains defensible and how a hosted product, service layer or network business converts adoption into durable revenue.
Quantify the improvement over legacy cost, settlement time, geographic coverage, counterparty risk and working-capital use, then account for FX, liquidity, privacy and compliance.
Because frontier outcomes cannot be reduced to predetermined answers, align founders and investors on the desired company and principles for navigating novel risks.
Stablecoins replace country-by-country payment integrations with one global platform and near-real-time settlement, but privacy, compliance and incumbent disruption must be designed for explicitly.
+ 36 more investments. View fund →