Associate at Greenfield Capital
Check size: No Anies-specific check size is public. Greenfield has led or co-led seed rounds in companies covered by his publications, but announced round size is not the firm's check and cannot establish his personal allocation. Founders should confirm current vehicle, stage, ownership and reserves directly.
Anies looks for crypto infrastructure that coordinates real economic activity: public blockchains modernizing capital markets, privacy-preserving compliance for institutional DeFi, security systems that respond to onchain threats, purpose-built networks for machines and stablecoin settlement that improves fragmented internet infrastructure. The recurring standard is that crypto must solve coordination, access, security or capital formation better than a conventional database or payment rail.
Explain the real market fragmentation or coordination failure, why a public or application-specific blockchain is necessary, actors and incentives, demand and unit economics, security, privacy and compliance, stablecoin or token flows, supply-side bootstrapping, local operations, adoption metrics and round. For machine or connectivity networks, quantify deployed infrastructure, service reliability and non-subsidized demand.
Purpose-built infrastructure with a clear economic actor and use case, large fragmented markets, crypto improving coordination or financing, strong security and compliance design, privacy-preserving institutional access, category-defining founders, networks that can demonstrate real service demand and products positioned to become foundational rather than merely incremental.
No personal pass list is public. His authored theses imply weak fit for generalized one-size-fits-all chains with no application advantage, tokenization without capital-market improvement, DePIN driven only by token subsidies, compliance systems that sacrifice privacy, security tooling with no response path, and emerging-market infrastructure without credible local operating and settlement execution.
Identify the fragmented actors, trust or financing constraint and show why programmable settlement or incentives solve it better than conventional infrastructure.
Map application-specific performance, economics, governance and integration requirements that a generalized chain cannot satisfy.
Separate token-subsidized supply from recurring service demand and measure utilization, reliability, revenue, capex financing and expansion economics.
Prove eligibility and counterparty constraints while minimizing disclosed identity or transaction data through sound cryptography and governance.
Model local operators, shared core infrastructure, routing or service standards, settlement, financing, regulation and customer affordability as one coordinated system.
A neutral backbone can aggregate fragmented African ISPs while stablecoin settlement and onchain financing improve coordination, costs and network expansion.
Autonomous devices will become economic agents and are better served by purpose-built, application-specific blockchain infrastructure than generic networks.
Wallet-linked communication and token incentives can turn email into a consent-based Web3 engagement and payments layer when users control relevance and rewards.
Zero-knowledge compliance can let institutions transact with eligible counterparties in DeFi while protecting sensitive information and preserving public-chain liquidity.
Public blockchains can improve capital-market access, settlement and programmability, but regulation, privacy, identity and infrastructure must mature for institutional adoption.
+ 48 more investments. View fund →