Partner at Collider Ventures
Check size: No reliable official current check range was found. Collider publicly describes itself as an early-stage Web3 investor and accepts pitches at invest@collider.vc; third-party directory estimates conflict, so founders should confirm current vehicle, stage and sizing directly.
Eylon connects two decentralization theses: crypto-native individual sovereignty that minimizes centralized authority through technology, and Web3 collective empowerment that democratizes ownership and access. In practice he looks for non-consensus early-stage infrastructure capable of moving capital formation, markets and digital ownership onchain while remaining alert to the new choke points, governance hierarchies and risk created by ostensibly permissionless systems.
Send a concise submission to Collider's official invest@collider.vc address and, where appropriate, reference Eylon through his exact @TheEylon or /in/eylonaviv profiles. State stage, instrument and round mechanics; do not rely on unverified directory check ranges. Lead with the non-consensus insight, why blockchain or programmable ownership is necessary, the user and distribution wedge, live technical evidence, governance and incentive design, security and liquidity risks, and what remains decentralized at scale. For financial infrastructure, show how the system behaves under stress and where control, compliance and value capture actually sit.
The strongest attributable fit is a technically credible, early-stage Web3 system with a genuinely non-consensus insight, a reason decentralization or programmable ownership must exist, and a path to broad access or individual sovereignty. His recent work favors resilient onchain financial rails, community-aligned incentives, transparent market structure, institutional-grade privacy and risk controls, and founders who can bridge crypto-native design with real economic use.
No personal pass list is public. His writing signals caution around hype without real value, excess leverage, fragile or opaque risk engines, centralized choke points disguised as open infrastructure, governance whose stated neutrality diverges from who controls the rules, tokenization without a functional reason, and systems that cannot survive a live market stress test. Treat these as evidence-based diligence concerns, not a quoted checklist.
Evaluate both whether a system increases individual sovereignty by minimizing centralized authority and whether it empowers groups through broader ownership and access; strong opportunities can advance both.
Start with the contrarian reason the product should exist and then ask whether blockchain, programmable ownership or permissionless coordination is actually necessary to make that insight work.
Map who controls fundraising, issuance, trading, custody, compliance and distribution; vertical integration may improve usability while quietly recreating centralized dependence.
Judge financial protocols by how their risk engines, liquidity and operations behave during cascading liquidations and extreme traffic, not only by growth in calm markets.
For open systems, distinguish what code permits from what communities, operators and law regard as legitimate; durable governance must address both layers explicitly.
Separate cyclical attention from durable value by identifying the financial or coordination function being upgraded, the measurable user benefit and the incentives that remain viable after speculation recedes.
Treasury-backed stablecoins can expand global dollar access and create a new marginal buyer of US debt, while shifting monetary-policy effects onto other currencies and economies.
Coinbase's Echo acquisition vertically integrates onchain capital formation, issuance, trading, custody and distribution, but the same full stack that broadens access may recentralize critical choke points.
A major leverage flush demonstrated the value of transparent DeFi risk engines while institutional prediction markets, privacy infrastructure and regulated indexes signaled deeper integration with capital markets.
The MEV-Boost exploit exposes how supposedly trustless systems still depend on people defining legitimate extraction, enforcement and fairness; code alone does not eliminate governance hierarchy.
Hyperliquid illustrates lean, global and stakeholder-aligned financial infrastructure in which validators and token holders govern key economic rights rather than a traditional corporate hierarchy.
+ 24 more investments. View fund →