Co-Founder & Partner
Founders FundCheck size: $1M-$100M+ (multi-stage, also invests personally and through Thiel Capital)
The original contrarian VC. 'We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters.' Seeks companies that can become category-defining monopolies in markets others ignore. First principles thinking is non-negotiable. The key question: 'What important truth do few people agree with you on?' Backs revolutionary technology, not incremental improvements. The Venn diagram of 'right' and 'different' is where he invests. Thiel's intellectual framework is deeply philosophical — draws from René Girard's mimetic theory (competition is imitation, and imitation destroys value), Leo Strauss, and libertarian economics. Founders Fund's motto: 'We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters' — a critique of Silicon Valley's focus on trivial consumer apps instead of transformative technology. Thiel distinguishes between 'definite optimism' (having a concrete plan to build a better future) and 'indefinite optimism' (vaguely hoping things get better). He champions the former. Created the Thiel Fellowship ($100K grants for young people to drop out of college and build companies) — alumni include Vitalik Buterin (Ethereum), Austin Russell (Luminar Technologies), and others.
Founders with a 'secret' — a contrarian belief about the world that is both unpopular and correct. Companies building genuine monopolies through technology. First-principles thinkers who question assumptions. Revolutionary technology, not incremental apps. Founders who can articulate a definite vision of the future. Companies in categories where there is no competition because the category didn't exist before.
Trend-following. Incremental improvements. 'Better mousetrap' pitches. Companies in crowded markets competing on execution rather than insight. Consensus ideas. Companies that describe themselves as 'Uber for X' or 'the X of Y.' Founders who can't answer 'What important truth do few people agree with you on?'
Don't pitch a trend. Pitch a secret. What do you believe that most people disagree with? Don't lead with competitive landscape — if you have lots of competitors, you're already losing. Lead with your contrarian insight about why the world is wrong. He wants to know what future you see that nobody else does. Be specific about how you'll build a monopoly. Start with a small market you can dominate, then show the expansion path. Don't pitch incremental improvement — pitch a paradigm shift. Show definite optimism: you have a concrete plan for a specific better future, not vague hopes. If your technology is genuinely 10x better than existing solutions, lead with that. Be intellectually honest and prepared for tough philosophical questions. Don't use buzzwords or talk about 'disruption' — show that you've thought deeply about what you're building and why it matters.
The fundamental distinction: going from 0 to 1 is creating something genuinely new (vertical/intensive progress). Going from 1 to n is copying what works (horizontal/extensive progress). Thiel and Founders Fund exclusively invest in 0-to-1 companies. Copying is competition; creation is monopoly.
The best businesses are monopolies — they dominate a market so completely that they face no meaningful competition. This isn't bad; it's the natural outcome of building something uniquely valuable. Monopolies have: proprietary technology (10x better), network effects, economies of scale, and brand. Start by monopolizing a small market, then expand.
Every great company is built on a 'secret' — an important truth that most people don't believe or haven't noticed. The interview question 'What important truth do few people agree with you on?' tests for this. If you can't articulate your secret, you don't have a company worth building.
Four quadrants: definite optimism (plan for a better future), indefinite optimism (hope for a better future without a plan), definite pessimism (plan for a worse future), indefinite pessimism (accept decline). Thiel champions definite optimism — having a concrete plan to build a specific better future. Silicon Valley has become too indefinitely optimistic.
Borrowed from René Girard: humans desire what others desire. Competition is imitation, and imitation destroys value. The most successful people and companies avoid competition entirely by pursuing paths that others don't see or don't value. Competition makes you worse at what you do because you focus on beating rivals rather than creating value.
Technology (doing new things) creates genuine progress. Globalization (copying what works to new places) is necessary but doesn't create new value. The developed world has focused too much on globalization and not enough on technology. True progress requires 0-to-1 breakthroughs.
Founders Fund manifesto arguing that technological progress has stagnated in the physical world. We have smartphones but not flying cars, fusion energy, or cures for cancer. The venture industry has become too focused on incremental software and not ambitious enough about transforming the physical world.
The intellectual foundation of Founders Fund. Key ideas: (1) Going from 0 to 1 (creating something new) is fundamentally different from going from 1 to n (copying what works). (2) Competition is for losers — the goal is to build a monopoly. (3) Every great company is built on a 'secret' — something true that no one else believes. (4) Definite optimism beats indefinite optimism. (5) The best businesses have characteristics of monopolies: proprietary technology, network effects, economies of scale, and branding.
Published in the Wall Street Journal. Argues that the most successful businesses avoid competition entirely by creating new categories. Companies that compete head-to-head destroy value. The goal is monopoly — and most founders don't think big enough.
The Stanford lectures that became 'Zero to One.' Notes were taken and published by Blake Masters. Covered monopoly theory, secrets, founder archetypes, distribution, and the importance of definite planning.
Famous and controversial essay arguing that democracy and freedom have become incompatible, and that the future of freedom lies in new frontiers — cyberspace, outer space, and seasteading. Catalyzed significant debate about tech libertarianism.
“What important truth do very few people agree with you on?”
— Zero to One / Stanford lectures
“Competition is for losers.”
— Zero to One / WSJ essay
“We wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters.”
— Founders Fund manifesto
“Every moment in business happens only once. The next Bill Gates will not build an operating system. The next Larry Page will not build a search engine. If you are copying these guys, you aren't learning from them.”
— Zero to One
“The most contrarian thing of all is not to oppose the crowd but to think for yourself.”
— Zero to One
“A startup is the largest group of people you can convince of a plan to build a different future.”
— Zero to One
“Brilliant thinking is rare, but courage is in even shorter supply than genius.”
— Zero to One
“If you want to create and capture lasting value, don't build an undifferentiated commodity business.”
— Zero to One
“The best entrepreneurs know this: every great business is built around a secret that's hidden from the outside.”
— Zero to One
Born in Frankfurt, Germany. Grew up in Foster City, California. Studied philosophy at Stanford, then Stanford Law School. Co-founded PayPal in 1998 with Max Levchin, serving as CEO through its 2002 acquisition by eBay for $1.5B. The PayPal founding team became the legendary 'PayPal Mafia' — arguably the most influential network in Silicon Valley history (Elon Musk/SpaceX/Tesla, Reid Hoffman/LinkedIn, Max Levchin/Affirm, David Sacks/Yammer/Craft Ventures, Chad Hurley + Steve Chen/YouTube, Jeremy Stoppelman/Yelp, and many more). Made the first outside investment in Facebook ($500K for 10.2% in 2004). Co-founded Palantir Technologies in 2003 with Joe Lonsdale and others — data analytics for intelligence agencies. Founded Clarium Capital (macro hedge fund) in 2002. Co-founded Founders Fund in 2005 with Ken Howery and Luke Nosek. Created the Thiel Fellowship in 2011. Wrote 'Zero to One' (2014) based on Stanford lectures. One of the most influential and controversial figures in technology — known for libertarian politics, support for Donald Trump (unusual in Silicon Valley), funding of the Hulk Hogan vs. Gawker lawsuit that bankrupted Gawker Media, and provocative public statements about technology stagnation.
Philosophical essay arguing that the post-9/11 world requires a new framework for understanding politics and technology. References Leo Strauss, Carl Schmitt, and René Girard. Shows the philosophical depth behind Thiel's investing worldview.